2014 US Open Week: Monday

State of the Game:  Tomorrow night Golf Channel is hosting another “State of the Game” panel discussion.  In year’s past, they did these earlier in the year at the WGC Match Play in February.  These panel discussion are usually halfway decent, being almost the only time when Johnny Miller, Nick Faldo, and the rest are bluntly honest.  (I don’t see Faldo’s name on the list, which is disappointing.  I hope his absence doesn’t alter the bluntness factor.)

Payne Stewart:  If you missed the documentary about Payne Stewart on NBC yesterday, be sure to catch the replay tonight on Golf Channel.  They did a great job of telling Payne’s story.  I think I got the biggest kick out of the old video footage of interviews.  Was it really only 2o years ago when Payne Stewart openly smoked and drank Budweiser when facing reporters?  In terms of Political Correctness, it seems like 20 decades ago.  I loved the interview after Payne lost a big event, where, finishing second, he told the reporters he was disappointed, but, hey, he still got a check for $50,000 and that might call for a celebratory drink later in the night.

Nowadays, our “star” golfers wouldn’t touch a cigarette or beer at a press conference.  No, no, they are Mister Perfect Family Honor Man to the world, but, when the cameras are off, they quickly jet off to load up on Ambien, steroids, and insider trading tips.  Call me weird, but I prefer Payne’s honesty and openness.  And, funny thing is, Payne actually was worthy of a World’s Greatest Dad coffee mug.

Keeping the game all about Tiger:  I was watching some televised LPGA action recently when it dawned on me how nice it was that the announcers didn’t seek to diminish the current players and game.  Here’s what I mean: With PGA broadcasts, the announcers are in a battle to see which one can most frequently point out, in some fashion or other, “Golf sucks without Tiger.”  You know the various ways:

  • Tiger spoiled us.
  • Of course, to put things in perspective, Tiger had won five more events by that age.
  • It’s just not the same without Tiger.
  • That gallery is big enough to be one of Tiger’s.

To them, it’s still always Tiger Tiger Tiger, even when he isn’t playing — and has not hit a ball in months.  They ignored his sex scandal, and they ignored Galea and Biogenesis; now they are even ignoring the fact that he major surgery and may never be as good as he was before the surgery.  And that version of Woods hadn’t won a major in five years.  The golf media seems incapable of moving on, even as we increasingly come to realize Woods is n0t going to reach 30 majors, not 25, not 20.  He’s not even going to get particularly close to Jack’s mark.

Watching the women, however, I was taken with how many times the camera switched between “equal stars.”  And, even though I don’t follow the LPGA all that closely, I knew the players.  No one dominated the coverage.  They all dominated the coverage.

And we did not hear — not once, certainly not over and over again — how none of those players was ever going to win double-digit majors like Annika Sorenstam did.  We weren’t told Annika was a once in a lifetime golfer, so these these others, in comparison, suck.  We didn’t hear how the Nabisco Classic major was pretty cool, but can’t hold a candle to its heyday with Dinah Shore, or during the years when Annika won or contended every year.

No, we hear about scores of pertinent golfers.  Lydia Ko, Lexi Thompson, Stacey Lewis, Inbee Park, Michelle Wie.  Suzann Pettersen and Anna Nordquist.  Paula Creamer.  Yani Tseng, for crying out loud.  Karrie Webb.  Azahara Munoz.  Charley Hull.  The list goes on and one.  Eveyone is in agreement: women’s golf is a lot of fun.

Now, would that be the case if the golf media, instead of building up the players, told us nonstop how much they all suck compared to Annika?  Of course, some of these young women will end up doing about as well — perhaps better — than Annika.  Just as some of the young male players will compare favorably to Woods in twenty years.  After all, their entire careers are ahead of them.

The golf media does great damage to the men’s game with their Tiger Only coverage.  The golf media could likewise damage the women’s game if all they talked about was, “Yeah, it was a good event, but I still miss Annika.  I hope her little foray into a pro-am event portends a return to competitive play.”  Then have panel discussions about whether they think she’ll return and what it would mean for and blah blah blah.

The lesson is clear: When it comes to golf, diversity is good.  The Tiger Only focus of PGA coverage is detrimental to the game.

Rex Hoggard, Hack Writer:  I recently said Hoggard was getting better, but he’s clearly headed in the wrong direction now.   A Grand Slam is a Grand Slam.  A Career Slam is a Career Slam.  Is that so difficult?  Also, “enormity” refers to something extremely wicked or evil, not simply “big.”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to 2014 US Open Week: Monday

  1. ANON says:

    Lanny H: You DO have the best golf website. But when you refer to the Tiger who hasn’t won a major since whenever, you are forgetting or ignoring the telling remarks from ANON in Vegas, i.e.,

    We talked about Tiger’s injuries a long time ago. Now I am talking YEARS ago — long before the girlfriend scandals emerged or anything of the kind, when Tiger was just tearing things up on tour. Living in Vegas I have the opportunity to know a lot of PGA golfers very well, and at the time they were all quietly talking about how Tiger was enjoying a “pharmaceutical edge.”
    Now, it’s pretty much common knowledge that he was using, and that his body is now breaking down as a result, right before our eyes. As for new revelations? Same old stuff. I think we are all in on the joke now

    • Nate says:

      I don’t build up any of these pros…I realize when things in sports look to good to be true, then it’s probably steroids……With that said, you wonder WHO or WHAT is holding back a more massive out pouring of ‘revelations’ about Eldrick’s steroid, and or performance enhancing drug use…….I mean I do know NBC is about as rigged a news network as it comes, and they own the golf channel, so there’s a possible reason….HOWEVER, there are a lot of independent sources, who could put out a lot of info, and yet, it just seems more ‘under the table’ style commenting or reporting………I can’t believe everyone is being bought off here……

      • lannyh says:

        Last night, I was thinking about how golf writers wrote about pretty much nothing but Tiger Woods for 12 years (and still do). And yet not one of them bothered to investigate Woods’s private life? Also, we know the Men’s Fitness parent company knew about the sex scandal 1-1/2 years before it was made public.
        I think Lance Armstrong showed us just how long a doping scandal can remain hidden, even when there are witnesses who have gone public. My guess is that Nike/the golf media seed Woods as their cash cow, and the sports media sees Nike as their cash cow and don’t want to put that at risk. Nike might yank all advertising over the entire network family of properties. They’d return eventually, but that would be after the executive who okayed the Woods doping expose was fired.
        Terez Owens HAS reported that Woods’s name is on the Biogenesis customer list. You never hear that mentioned in the regular media, though. The media has really gotten cowardly, it seems.

    • lannyh says:

      First off, thanks for the compliment. Second, I wish the media would admit they are in on the joke.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s